10 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Steve commented  ·  October 26, 2011 04:07  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  An absolute requirement for us to consider even evaluating your product. (fortune 500 company)

• Michael commented  ·  August 15, 2011 00:06  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is an very important feature and very simple to implement because of the special file abstraction layer (ok, it was simple to implement in Version 2.x). Without this feature my DB would have gigabites of data .....

• Remon van Gijn commented  ·  July 13, 2011 03:52  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Dejan, I support the Idea to have this optional of course.
  Could you pls vote for this item?

• Remon van Gijn commented  ·  June 13, 2011 10:12  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is now getting more of an issue for us.
  We have lots of larger attachments in our DB and the total size is growing, being a pain for backups etc.

  Please make effort for this AC !

• NightOwl commented  ·  March 06, 2011 18:25  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Remon - just to explain per your request for an explanation - in my case users typically want to attach semi-large files (like a 2mb PDF or image) and I'd like the option to keep the size of the DB down by storing files elsewhere. Makes for easier backup and restore of database in case I ever need to restore it. As I mention in response to Remon - I agree that it should be OPTIONAL feature setting, for those who prefer to store attachments in DB. Hope that is understandable.

• NightOwl commented  ·  March 06, 2011 18:18  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Dejan - I agree that it should be an Optional setting, I just didn't think to word it that way and I can't edit the original suggestion I made.

  I'm definitely all for it being an "Option" , not a default.

• James Hagist commented  ·  January 24, 2011 09:16  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Optional feature would be nice

• Dejan commented  ·  January 08, 2011 14:30  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It's more secure to keep those files in the database, but I understand that someone may have a lot of attachments where db size can become an issue, so I don't think this is a bad idea, I just think that should be an optional feature, if implemented.

• Remon commented  ·  January 07, 2011 04:10  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Great, thanks for having and sharing your oppinion, but why the objection, please state the issue you have with it.

  Remon

• Dejan commented  ·  January 07, 2011 03:41  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I don't like this idea so if this is accepted that should be an optional feature.